\ > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] char: rpmb: provide a user space interface > > On Sun 2016-09-04 11:35:33, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:05:26PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:44:03AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon 2016-07-18 23:27:49, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > > > > > > The user space API is achieved via two synchronous IOCTL. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IOCTLs? > > > > > > > > > > > > Will fix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Simplified one, RPMB_IOC_REQ_CMD, were read result cycles > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > performed > > > > > > > > by the framework on behalf the user and second, > > > > > > > > RPMB_IOC_SEQ_CMD > > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > the whole RPMB sequence including RESULT_READ is supplied > > > > > > > > by the > > > > > caller. > > > > > > > > The latter is intended for easier adjusting of the > > > > > > > > applications that use MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD ioctl. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why " "? > > > > > > Not sure I there is enough clue in your question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > +static long rpmb_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd, > > > > > > > > +unsigned long arg) { > > > > > > > > + return __rpmb_ioctl(fp, cmd, (void __user *)arg); } > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > > > > > > +static long rpmb_compat_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd, > > > > > > > > + unsigned long arg) { > > > > > > > > + return __rpmb_ioctl(fp, cmd, compat_ptr(arg)); > > > > > > > > +} > > > > > > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Description of the ioctl is missing, > > > > > > Will add. > > > > > > > > > > > > and it should certainly be designed in a way > > > > > > > that it does not need compat support. > > > > > > > > > > > > The compat_ioctl handler just casts the compat_ptr, I believe > > > > > > this should be done unless the ioctl is globaly registered in > > > > > > fs/compat_ioctl.c, but I might be wrong. > > > > > > > > > > You shouldn't need a compat ioctl for anything new that is > > > > > added, unless your api is really messed up. Please test to be > > > > > sure, and not use a compat ioctl at all, it isn't that hard to do. > > > > > > > > compat_ioctl is called anyhow when CONFIG_COMPAT is set, there is > > > > no way around it, or I'm missing something? Actually there is no > > > > more than that for the COMPAT support in this code. > > > > > > If you don't provide a compat_ioctl() all should be fine, right? > > > > No, this doesn't work the driver has to provide compat_ioctl > > > > You would expect something like > > if (!f.file->f_op->compat_ioctl) { > > error = > > f_op->f.file->f_op->unlocked_ioctl((f.file, cmd, compat_ptr(arg)) } > > But there is no such code under fs/compat_ioctl.c > > > > The translation has to implemented by the device driver or registered > > directly in fs/compat_ioct.c in do_ioctl_trans or ioctl_pointer[] > > > > If compat_ioct is not provided the application is receiving > > : ioctl failure -1: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > Care to submit a patch? We should not really have to include compat_ioctl > support if it is already compatible... > > Or maybe better provide empty function drivers can fill in when > compatible...? > I'm not sure it is so simple to generallize, because ioctl selection logic in compat_ioctl has already a default actions and second because 'arg' my not be a pointer. Maybe a beter option would be to provide a function in spirit generic_ fs functions let say compat_generic_ioct() that would just cal unlocked_ioctl(fp, cmd, compat_ptr(arg)) Thanks Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html