Thanks. Resending… On 8/31/16, 4:51 PM, "Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 29 August 2016 at 19:32, alex.lemberg <alex.lemberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Flash based storage devices might need to perform the internal >> Background Operations (BKOPS) in order to insure better performance >> for the next coming IO. >> Following the discussion in the mmc thread: >> www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg37779.html >> To let the device complete its BKOPS during Runtime Suspend, >> we suggest to check the BKOPS level. >> In case the device need to complete its BKOPS, reschedule the Runtime >> Suspend. >> >> alex.lemberg (3): >> mmc: replacing hardcoded value for runtime PM suspend >> mmc: Adding AUTO_BKOPS_EN bit set for Auto BKOPS support >> mmc: Checking BKOPS status prior to Suspend >> >> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 3 ++- >> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 + >> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 2 ++ >> include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 2 ++ >> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> > >Alex, thanks for posting this. Although, the patches doesn't show up >in the https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mmc/list/. I guess >it's because you must have linux-mmc on the to list. Could you please >resend? > >Kind regards >Uffe ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��i��)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
