On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:27:47PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > V2: resend > V3: add more verbose description > V4: resend > V5: adjust date and kernel version > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..3ffcd2d1f683 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-rpmb > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > +What: /sys/class/rpmb/ > +Date: Aug 2016 > +KernelVersion: 4.8 > +Contact: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> > +Description: > + The rpmb/ class sub-directory belongs to RPMB device class. > + > + Few storage technologies such is EMMC, UFS, and NVMe support > + Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) hardware partition with > + common protocol and frame layout. > + Such a partition provides authenticated and replay protected access, > + hence suitable as a secure storage. > + > +What: /sys/class/rpmb/rpmbN/ > +Date: Aug 2016 > +KernelVersion: 4.8 > +Contact: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> > +Description: > + The /sys/class/rpmb/rpmbN directory is created for > + each RPMB registered device So you have no sysfs files? If not, why have a sysfs class at all? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
