Hi Ulf, 2016. 8. 29., 오후 8:13, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> 작성: > > On 29 August 2016 at 11:17, Jaedon Shin <jaedon.shin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Removes incorrect 64-bit ADMA capability on Broadcom MIPS based SoCs. >> The MIPS based BRCMSTB SDHCI host controllers are using ADMA only, but >> the several chipsets have a incorrect capability about ADMA 64-bit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaedon Shin <jaedon.shin@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c >> index cce10fe3e19e..683bfc2af512 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c >> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static int sdhci_brcmstb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> * properties through mmc_of_parse(). >> */ >> host->caps = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES); >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS)) > > I thought we agreed on using a specific DT compatible string to > distinguish what to do here was better? No? My mistake. please drop this patch. The v3 patch should have new compatible string “brcm,bcm7445-sdhci”. The BCM7445 is initial and typical 28nm generation ARM SoC. I’ll be send updated patch next day. Thanks, Jaedon > >> + host->caps &= ~SDHCI_CAN_64BIT; >> host->caps1 = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1); >> host->caps1 &= ~(SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR50 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR104 | >> SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50); >> -- >> 2.9.3 >> > > Kind regards > Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
