Hi,
On 11-08-16 15:31, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 10-08-16 20:48, Rob Herring wrote:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:57:48PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Espressif is a manufacturer of various wifi and bt chips, add a vendor
prefix for use with bindings for these chips.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you for all the reviews.
What about: "[PATCH 2/2] dt: bindings: Add binding for ESP8089 wifi chips" ?
there were some remarks, but I believe that those have been addressed
(by answering the remarks, not with a new version), so a review of that
one would be appreciated too.
What about Arnd's comment "better use '-' instead of '_' for property names."
Ah yes, I forgot about that comment. As explained in the commit msg
I named the dt property to be the same as the keyword used in the
ini-like config file android uses for this (the android driver loads a
file with board specific esp8089 config like the crystal-type from
/lib/firmware).
And that file does use '_'. I want to keep the names the same as that
seems the sensible thing to do, but if there is a great preference for
'-' in dt I can do a v2 with that changed.
Also who should merge this series, Ulf because it is mmc related,
or the dt-maintainers since it contains only bindings patches ?
I can take it.
Great, thanks.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
