On 28/06/16 14:23, Adrian Hunter wrote: > Split sdhci-add_host() in order to further our objective to make > sdhci into a library. s/sdhci-add_host/sdhci_add_host > The split divides code that sets up mmc and sdhci parameters, from > code that actually activates things - such as tasklet initialization, > requesting the irq, and adding (and starting) the host. > > This gives drivers an opportunity to change various settings before > committing to start the host. > > Drivers can continue to call sdhci_add_host() but drivers that want > to take advantage of the split instead call sdhci_setup_host() followed > by __sdhci_add_host(). If sdhci_setup_host() is successful, but then the subsequent call to __sdhci_add_host() fails, then what should be called to clean-up? Does not look like we can still call sdhci_remove_host() in this case. Cheers Jon -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
