Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Fix tag condition with packed writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10 June 2016 at 15:22, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Apparently a cut-and-paste error, 'do_data_tag' is using 'brq' for data
> size even though 'brq' has not been set up. Instead use blk_rq_sectors().
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied for next!

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
>
>
> Hi
>
> I don't know if anyone is actually using packed writes, but this is
> something I noticed.
>
> Regards
> Adrian
>
>
>  drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> index b954516739be..aa5cfaf1fdf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> @@ -1834,8 +1834,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_packed_hdr_wrq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
>                 do_data_tag = (card->ext_csd.data_tag_unit_size) &&
>                         (prq->cmd_flags & REQ_META) &&
>                         (rq_data_dir(prq) == WRITE) &&
> -                       ((brq->data.blocks * brq->data.blksz) >=
> -                        card->ext_csd.data_tag_unit_size);
> +                       blk_rq_bytes(prq) >= card->ext_csd.data_tag_unit_size;
>                 /* Argument of CMD23 */
>                 packed_cmd_hdr[(i * 2)] =
>                         (do_rel_wr ? MMC_CMD23_ARG_REL_WR : 0) |
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux