On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:25:58AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Simon
>
> Some question/comment from me
>
> about new flags "TMIO_MMC_HAS_UHS_SCC",
> you added it on [1/3] patch with this comment
> "Remove unused TMIO_MMC_HAS_UHS_SCC define"
> but, [1/3] patch adds it, not removed ?
Thanks, the comment got out of sync with the code at some point.
> > +static void sh_mobile_sdhi_hw_reset(struct tmio_mmc_host *host)
> > +{
> > + struct tmio_mmc_data *pdata = host->pdata;
> > +
> > + if (pdata->flags & TMIO_MMC_HAS_UHS_SCC) {
> > + /* Reset SCC */
> (snip)
> > + if (mmc_data->capabilities & MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104) {
> > + mmc_data->capabilities |= MMC_CAP_HW_RESET;
> > + mmc_data->flags |= TMIO_MMC_HAS_UHS_SCC;
> > + }
>
> And, how about this on sh_mobile_sdhi_hw_reset() ?
> We can avoid to add new flags TMIO_MMC_HAS_UHS_SCC ?
>
> static void sh_mobile_sdhi_hw_reset(struct tmio_mmc_host *host)
> {
> ...
>
> if (pdata->capabilities & MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104) {
> ...
> }
That seems reasonable, I'll see if I can get it to work.
> > +static inline void sd_scc_write32(struct tmio_mmc_host *host, int addr,
> > + u32 val)
> > +{
> > + struct platform_device *pdev = host->pdev;
> > + const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> > + of_match_device(sh_mobile_sdhi_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> > + const struct sh_mobile_sdhi_of_data *of_data = of_id->data;
> > +
> > + writel(val, host->ctl + of_data->scc_offset +
> > + (addr << host->bus_shift));
> > +}
> (snip)
> > static const struct sh_mobile_sdhi_of_data of_rcar_gen2_compatible = {
> > .tmio_flags = TMIO_MMC_HAS_IDLE_WAIT | TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE |
> > TMIO_MMC_CLK_ACTUAL | TMIO_MMC_MIN_RCAR2,
> > .capabilities = MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ,
> > .dma_buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES,
> > .dma_rx_offset = 0x2000,
> > + .scc_offset = 0x0300,
> > + .taps = rcar_gen2_scc_taps,
> > + .taps_num = ARRAY_SIZE(rcar_gen2_scc_taps),
> > };
> (snip)
> > + host->set_clk_div = sh_mobile_sdhi_set_clk_div;
> > host->dma = dma_priv;
> > host->write16_hook = sh_mobile_sdhi_write16_hook;
> > host->clk_enable = sh_mobile_sdhi_clk_enable;
> > @@ -364,6 +596,12 @@ static int sh_mobile_sdhi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > host->clk_disable = sh_mobile_sdhi_clk_disable;
> > host->multi_io_quirk = sh_mobile_sdhi_multi_io_quirk;
> > host->start_signal_voltage_switch = sh_mobile_sdhi_start_signal_voltage_switch;
> > + host->inquiry_tuning = sh_mobile_sdhi_inquiry_tuning;
> > + host->init_tuning = sh_mobile_sdhi_init_tuning;
> > + host->prepare_tuning = sh_mobile_sdhi_prepare_tuning;
> > + host->select_tuning = sh_mobile_sdhi_select_tuning;
> > + host->retuning = sh_mobile_sdhi_retuning;
> > + host->hw_reset = sh_mobile_sdhi_hw_reset;
>
> You registered new callback functions on this driver,
> and it is using sd_scc_read/write function, and it is based on "scc_offset".
> This driver is used from not only Gen2, but also Gen1/Gen3/SH-Mobile.
> But you added .scc_offset only on of_rcar_gen2_compatible.
> What's happen on Gen1/Gen3/SH-Mobile ?
Probably not much good :(
I'll work on correcting that.
> > +static bool sh_mobile_sdhi_inquiry_tuning(struct tmio_mmc_host *host)
> > +{
> > + /* SDHI should be tuning only SDR104 */
> > + if (host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104)
> > + return true;
> > + else
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> How about this ?
>
> return (host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104);
Sure, thanks for the suggestion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
