Hi Ulf,
Sorry for replying late.
On 04/07/2016 10:07 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 7 April 2016 at 14:07, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 04:57 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> Commit 520bd7a8b415 ("mmc: core: Optimize boot time by detecting cards
>>> simultaneously") causes regressions for some platforms.
>>>
>>> These platforms relies on fixed mmcblk device indexes, instead of
>>> deploying the defacto standard with UUID/PARTUUID. In other words their
>>> rootfs needs to be available at hardcoded paths, like /dev/mmcblk0p2.
>>>
>>> Such guarantees have never been made by the kernel, but clearly the above
>>> commit changes the behaviour. More precisely, because of that the order
>>> changes of how cards becomes detected, so do their corresponding mmcblk
>>> device indexes.
>>>
>>> As the above commit significantly improves boot time for some platforms
>>> (magnitude of seconds), let's avoid reverting this change but instead
>>> restore the behaviour of how mmcblk device indexes becomes picked.
>>>
>>> By using the same index for the mmcblk device as for the corresponding mmc
>>> host device, the probe order of mmc host devices decides the index we get
>>> for the mmcblk device.
>>>
>>> For those platforms that suffers from a regression, one could expect that
>>> this updated behaviour should be sufficient to meet their expectations of
>>> "fixed" mmcblk device indexes.
>>>
>>> Another side effect from this change, is that the same index is used for
>>> the mmc host device, the mmcblk device and the mmc block queue. That
>>> should clarify their relationship.
>>
>> I have tested with this patch..but there also are side-effects.
>> Exynos4 series has the two host controller..one is sdhci, one is dwmmc for eMMC.
>> In this case, dwmmc controller is probed after sdhci controller.
>>
>> Then eMMC is always assigned to mmcblk1.
>
> Okay, let me follow up with some questions.
>
> 1)
> What is the sdhci controller used for?
Some of Exynos4 series have two MMC host controller.
As i mentioned, one is sdhci, other is dwmmc.
sdhci controller can be used for eMMC/SD/SDIO. (emmc, T-flash, WiFi)
And dwmmc controller can be only used for eMMC.
It can choose which controller user uses.
In normal, i recommend the dwmmc controller is used for eMMC.
(There are some reason..I/O performance, and functionality.)
>
> 2)
> Are you seeing regressions for Exynos for this? I was under the
> assumption that your vendor trees contained patches to deal with fixed
> mmcblk ids?
Actually not...but i need to check more..in vendor tress.
>
> 3)
> You proposed [1] recently to use aliases in DT to support fixed mmcblk
> ids. I do realize that as UUID/PARTUUID sometimes can be a bit
> cumbersome to use for an embedded system. Using aliases via DT seems
> like a very good option. To implement that on top of $subject patch
> should be quite easy to fix (I am happy to help with it). Would that
> address your concerns?
I saw this patch was applied in your repository..So i will test with your tree.
In normal case, i think it's not problem...but i remembered there is a rare case about removable case.
I will try to test with all cases..:)
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>
>>
>> I think it's not good that make another problem for solving something.
>> It needs more discussion for this..
>
> Thanks for testing and your comments!
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> [1]
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg35980.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
