Dear all, Seems the following thread[1] didn't go anywhere. I'd like to continue the discussion and share some tests that I did regarding the issue that the patch is trying to fix. First I reproduced the issue on my rockchip board and I tested the patch intensively, I can confirm that the patch made by Doug fixes the issue.But, as reported by Alim, seems that this patch has the side effect that breaks mmc on peach-pi board [2], specially on suspend/resume, I ran lots of tests on peach-pi and, although is a bit random, I can also confirm the breakage. Looks like that on peach-pi, when the patch is applied the controller moves into a data transfer and the interrupt does not come, then the task blocks. The reason why I think the dw_mmc-rockchip driver works is because it has the DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_DTO quirk [3]. So I did lots of tests on peach-pi with dto quirk, suspend/resume started to work again. But I guess this is not the proper solution or it is? Thoughts? [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/18/495 [2] https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/169384/log_file#L_195_5 [3] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c?id=57e104864bc4874a36796fd222d8d084dbf90b9b Cheers, Enric > > Alim, > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> On peach-pi, I got a hung task once in 4 cold boot as [1]. > > OK, I'll have to get my peach-pi or peach-pit up and running again. I > ran out of desk space and I haven't gotten it set back up. :( > > I've been testing on an rk3288-based device. Past experience has > taught me that the rk3288 dw_mmc works differently than the exynos > one, so perhaps this is a difference. > > Could you possibly patch in something like > <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/244347/> and provide the > console for the failure? I'll put it on my list to try this myself, > too > > >> I was checking on v4.1-rc5, git hash as below: >> >> 862e58a mmc: dw_mmc: Wait for data transfer after response errors >> ba155e2 Linux 4.1-rc5 >> 5b13966 >> >> Not sure if I missed any dependent patch?? > > I'm currently testing out of tree, but my dw_mmc is very close to mainline. > > >> Have not checked the dw TRM for this change, will do that as soon as I >> get access to it. > > OK, sounds good. I have some old version of the DesignWare TRM, so > possibly something is different in the newer one... > > > -Doug > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html