On 7 March 2016 at 04:17, Nguyen Viet Dung <nv-dung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ulf > > I have testted two cases use these patchs that you send. > > case01: > [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sh_mmcif: Make sure the device stays active when needed in > ->probe() > [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sh_mmcif: Restructure ->set_ios() > [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sh_mmci: Get rid of wrapper function for regulators > > case02: > [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sh_mmcif: Make sure the device stays active when needed in > ->probe() > > The problem of mmcif is not resolved by both two cases. Okay, thanks for testing! Even if it doesn't solve you original issue after a system PM resumed has been accomplished, does the driver still works as before? In other words are cards detected properly and can data transfers be done? The reason for my question, is that I think these patches makes some nice cleanups of some of the PM related code in the driver. So unless you see a *new* regression, I would like to apply them. [...] Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
