On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/03/16 04:07, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> DMA mask will already be set by sdhci_set_dma_mask(), which >> is equivalent to the removed code since pci_set_dma_mask() >> expands to its DMA-API counterpart. >> >> There should also be no reason to set the DMA mask after probe. > > Let's run that by the PCI mailing list just to be sure. The patches for > reference: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=145731654328126&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=145731654328128&w=2 > > change the sdhci-pci driver to set the DMA mask once during probe instead of > every time during resume. Is there any reason a PCI device driver might > need to set the DMA mask every time during resume? Not seeing much reaction for this patchset. PCI being the only possible point of contention, can we maybe roll it into -next and see what happens? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
