On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 04:20:43PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 10/02/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:00:09PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote: > >> On 10/02/16 14:51, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > >>> Hi Adrian, > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:50:44PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote: > >>>> On 10/02/16 11:58, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > >>>>> By putting the device in suspend at the end of the probe, it is > >>>>> impossible to wake up on non software event such as card > >>>>> insertion/removal. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> Since I had no feedback on this topic: > >>>>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/35160 > >>>>> > >>>>> I would like to no more put the device in suspend at the end of the probe. If > >>>>> my device is suspended at the end of the probe, I have no issue to resume on > >>>>> a software event such as mounting my sdcard but hardware event such as card > >>>>> insertion and removal do not trigger a resume. > >>>> > >>>> You can't use runtime PM unless you have a way to wake-up. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Thanks for your feedback. I am a bit disappointed since Ulf advised me to use > >>> runtime PM instead of system PM. > >>> > >>>> Currently, sdhci disables card detect interrupts when runtime suspended, > >>>> and drivers use a card-detect GPIO to wake-up. > >>>> > >>> > >>> It is what I have seen going through the sdhci layer. So next question is: > >>> is it normal to not take care of card detect interrupts? We keep enabled > >>> some IRQs probably for SDIO modules IRQ but not for card detection. I > >>> don't understand the reason. > >> > >> Does sdhci-of-at91.c generate card detect interrupts while runtime suspended? > > > > It could if I keep one or two clocks enabled (need extra tests to be > > sure about the clock needed to get this interrupt). I have tried to modify > > quickly sdhci_runtime_suspend_host() to enable card insertion/removal, > > there is an irq generated but the kernel complains this irq is not > > handled. I didn't dig further, it was only to do a simple test. > > sdhci_irq() returns immediately if (host->runtime_suspended && > !sdhci_sdio_irq_enabled(host)) Ok so do I have to rework this part to allow wake up on card detect or do I have to remove runtime PM from my driver? > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
