Re: [PATCH v2 08/24] mmc: sdhci: avoid unnecessary mapping/unmapping of align buffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/01/16 14:29, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 03:44:38PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 21/12/15 13:41, Russell King wrote:
>>> Unnecessarily mapping and unmapping the align buffer for SD cards is
>>> expensive: performance measurements on iMX6 show that this gives a hit
>>> of 10% on hdparm buffered disk reads.
>>>
>>> MMC/SD card IO comes from the mm/vfs which gives us page based IO, so
>>> for this case, the align buffer is not going to be used.  However, we
>>> still map and unmap this buffer.
>>>
>>> Eliminate this by switching the align buffer to be a DMA coherent
>>> buffer, which needs no DMA maintenance to access the buffer.
>>
>> Did you consider putting the align buffer in the same allocation
>> as the adma_table?
> 
> It's not clear whether host->adma_table_sz would be appropriately
> aligned.
> 
>>> @@ -3003,6 +2972,10 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
>>>  						      host->adma_table_sz,
>>>  						      &host->adma_addr,
>>>  						      GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +		host->align_buffer = dma_alloc_coherent(mmc_dev(mmc),
>>> +							host->align_buffer_sz,
>>> +							&host->align_addr,
>>> +							GFP_KERNEL);
>>>  		host->align_buffer = kmalloc(host->align_buffer_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> kmalloc line is still there
> 
> Good catch, thanks.
> 
>>> +
>>> +		/* dma_alloc_coherent returns page aligned and sized buffers */
>>> +		BUG_ON(host->align_addr & host->align_mask);
>>
>> It would be nicer not to have any BUG_ON()
> 
> This is a situation that should _never_ occur (if it does, then the
> dma_alloc_coherent() implementation is violating the API requirements,
> which are to return a page-sized page-aligned buffer.)  I guess it
> could be a WARN_ON(), but if it fails we're likely to cause data
> corruption.  So, a WARN_ON() and failing the probe seems more
> appropriate - but then that means yet more messy cleanup in an already
> messy part of the driver.

Isn't there already a cleanup path? i.e.

		} else if (host->adma_addr & host->align_mask) {
			pr_warn("%s: unable to allocate aligned ADMA descriptor\n",
				mmc_hostname(mmc));
			host->flags &= ~SDHCI_USE_ADMA;
			dma_free_coherent(mmc_dev(mmc), host->adma_table_sz,
					  host->adma_table, host->adma_addr);
			kfree(host->align_buffer);
			host->adma_table = NULL;
			host->align_buffer = NULL;
		}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux