On Monday 28 December 2015 15:55:28 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 28 December 2015 15:54:35 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 28 December 2015 15:41:01 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Monday 28 December 2015 15:28:48 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Monday 28 December 2015 15:14:50 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > On Friday 25 December 2015 13:53:11 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > On Monday 18 May 2015 17:07:57 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > On Monday 18 May 2015 08:06:07 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > > > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [150515 14:26]: > > > > > > > > > On Friday 15 May 2015 23:22:37 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > > > If setting up the generic binding is expected to take a > > > > > > > > while, you can naturally pass it in pdata while waiting > > > > > > > > for the generic binding to get merged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, good idea. So the n900 machine can use auxdata to > > > > > > > pass this for the time being, while the binding and > > > > > > > generic implementation is being worked out. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, so what is needed to finish this patch series? > > > > > > > > > > I don't know where we are at this point. Has either the > > > > > auxdata approach or the generic binding been worked on at > > > > > all? > > > > > > > > What are auxdata data? > > > > > > I mean you can add the platform data to the omap_auxdata_lookup[] > > > table for this board. > > > > But can I mix data from omap3-n900.dts and omap_auxdata_lookup[]? > > Yes. > > Arnd Hm... looks like it is not possible. omap_hsmmc driver ignores any supplied platform data if there are device tree data. So array omap_auxdata_lookup[] does not help. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
