On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:50:50AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > [...] > > >> > >> This doesn't seems like a case where a gpio regulator should be used > >> and I am not sure what problem it would solve. Beside to suppress the > >> log warnings (actually those aren't warnings but informations). > >> > >> Isn't sdhci_do_start_signal_voltage_switch() doing what you need here? > >> > > > > It is. I am only wondering the best way to describe the hardware: > > - No regulator but I have the 'no vqmmc regulator not found' message which > > is a bit annoying and which can be interpreted as an issue for someone > > who has no knowledge about this stuff. > > Hmm, should we turn them into debug messages? Both regulators are optional. > I think so. From my point of view, it is useless to indicate that something optionnal is missing. > > - Describe the regulator since there is one on my board. But it is not a > > fixed regulator and even if it's close to a gpio one it is not. > > If it's driven by SDHCI internal logic, I would leave it to that. > There are no need to describe it at all. Ok thanks for your help. > > Kind regards > Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
