Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2 October 2015 at 09:53, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/02/2015 04:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2015, 11:52:00 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
>>> On 10/02/2015 06:05 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>> On 1 October 2015 at 19:35, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/01, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>>>>> Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2015, 11:54:24 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
>>>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:55, Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 16:42:05 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
>>>>>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:07, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The clock changes of course only touch internals of the phase-clocks,
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>> should have no problem going through another tree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What happens if I take mmc and dt changes, wouldn't I need the clock
>>>>>>> patches as well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The API stays of course the same, only the degree to settings
>>>>>> translation gets optimized, so I guess in the worst case you would get
>>>>>> no good phase and thus fall back to non-highspeed modes - but the
>>>>>> system would stay running.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But of course, if the clock maintainers could Ack the two clock patches
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> everything would stay together that would work even better :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> If Ulf doesn't want to take them we can apply them to clk tree.
>>>>> Otherwise, you can have my acked-by on the clk patches.
>>>>
>>>> I don't mind picking up the clock patches. So I consider this as an
>>>> ack for both patch 1 and patch2, thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Now, let's give Jaehoon some time to review the dw_mmc parts.
>>>
>>> I will check other patches on today, if it's ok, i will apply at my
>>> repository. Thanks for giving time! :)
>>
>> I think Ulf wanted to apply the whole series via the mmc tree directly, but I
>> guess that is between you two to decide ;-)
>
> If it will get Stephen's acked-by, i will pick up all after checked the dwmmc patches. how about?

Stephen already acked the clock patches from this thread.

Perhaps this time, it's easier if you ack the dw_mmc patches and I can
pick up the hole series? Does that work for you?

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux