On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 14:05 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 10 August 2015 at 18:50, Joakim Tjernlund > <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > in mmc_power_up() we have: > > /* Try to set signal voltage to 3.3V but fall back to 1.8v or 1.2v */ > > if (__mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330) == 0) > > dev_err(mmc_dev(host), "Initial signal voltage of 3.3v\n"); > > else if (__mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180) == 0) > > dev_err(mmc_dev(host), "Initial signal voltage of 1.8v\n"); > > else if (__mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_120) == 0) > > dev_err(mmc_dev(host), "Initial signal voltage of 1.2v\n"); > > > > Here one jut brutally tries to set the initial power to 3.3 but nowhere in > > general code there is a check if the controller can handle this w.r.t > > HOST CAPS. > > You are right, it's brutal. :-) > > Perhaps the host driver should return -EINVAL when a voltage level > can't be reached. The above code should not print messages as errors, > at least as long some voltage level can be used. > > > Where should this check be performed, I am guessing either here or in sdhci? > > This is all new to me so I am just throwing this out there > > Do you want to send a patch? No, you didn't answer the question -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
