On 08/06/2015 02:17 AM, Chen Bough wrote:
I will format a patch based on your diff file firstly. I will test this on my side,
If any issue, like dma issue or performance issue, I will add some modification.
Then I will send the patch for review, and you can test the patch on your platform.
Best Regards
Haibo Chen
Did I miss the follow up patch or is this still pending? If it's still pending,
would you mind Ccing me when it's available for testing?
Thanks,
Laura
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:jslaby@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 5:07 PM
To: Chen Haibo-B51421; Ulf Hansson
Cc: linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linux kernel mailing list
Subject: Re: [RFC] sdhci: fix DMA leaks [was: [SHDCI] Heavy (thousands)
DMA leaks]
On 08/06/2015, 09:42 AM, Chen Bough wrote:
I read your attached log and patch, yes, dma memory leak will happen
when more than one pre_request execute. The method of ++next->cookie
is not good, your patch seems good, but I still need some time to test
the patch, because you unmap the dma in sdhci_finish_data rather than
the sdhci_post_req.
Hi,
yes, this is not correct. We can perhaps differentiate according to the
COOKIE value. Should I fix it or are you going to prepare a patch based
on my RFC?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
