Hello Brian, On 08/20/2015 11:11 PM, Brian Norris wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:13AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Patches #1 and #2 solves a), patches #3 to #8 solves b) and patches > > ^^^ I'm dying to know how this sentence ends :) > Sigh, I did some last minute restructuring of the cover letter and seems I missed a sentence. I meant to said: "and patches #9 to #17 solves c)." >> Patch #18 changes the logic of spi_uevent() to report an OF modalias if >> the device was registered using OF. But this patch is included in the >> series only as an RFC for illustration purposes since changing that >> without first applying all the other patches in this series, will break >> module autoloading for the drivers of devices registered using OF but >> that lacks an of_match_table. I'll repost patch #18 once all the patches >> in this series have landed. > > On a more productive note, the patches I've looked at look good to me. > The missing aliases are a problem enough that should be fixed (i.e., > part (b)). I'll leave the SPI framework changes to others to comment on. > Great, thanks a lot for your feedback. > Brian > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
