Hello Michał Mirosław,
The patch 5f5bac8272be: "mmc: Driver for CB710/720 memory card reader
(MMC part)" from May 22, 2009, leads to the following static checker
warning:
drivers/mmc/host/cb710-mmc.c:579 cb710_mmc_set_ios()
warn: 'err' can be either negative or positive
drivers/mmc/host/cb710-mmc.c
112
113 static int cb710_check_event(struct cb710_slot *slot, u8 what)
114 {
115 u16 status;
116
117 status = cb710_read_port_16(slot, CB710_MMC_STATUS_PORT);
118
119 if (status & CB710_MMC_S0_FIFO_UNDERFLOW) {
120 /* it is just a guess, so log it */
121 dev_dbg(cb710_slot_dev(slot),
122 "CHECK : ignoring bit 6 in status %04X\n", status);
123 cb710_write_port_8(slot, CB710_MMC_STATUS0_PORT,
124 CB710_MMC_S0_FIFO_UNDERFLOW);
125 status &= ~CB710_MMC_S0_FIFO_UNDERFLOW;
126 }
127
128 if (status & CB710_MMC_STATUS_ERROR_EVENTS) {
129 dev_dbg(cb710_slot_dev(slot),
130 "CHECK : returning EIO on status %04X\n", status);
131 cb710_write_port_8(slot, CB710_MMC_STATUS0_PORT, status & 0xFF);
132 cb710_write_port_8(slot, CB710_MMC_STATUS1_PORT,
133 CB710_MMC_S1_RESET);
134 return -EIO;
135 }
136
137 /* 'what' is a bit in MMC_STATUS1 */
138 if ((status >> 8) & what) {
139 cb710_write_port_8(slot, CB710_MMC_STATUS1_PORT, what);
140 return 1;
There are two callers to this function. It appears to me that one
expects zero on error and one expects non-zero on error. It is
confusing and there are no comments explaining the return codes.
141 }
142
143 return 0;
144 }
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
