On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 17:20 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:36:07AM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 13:06 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How about this one:
> > > >
> > > > From af6b18c056b6064424bd2ab1f9989bbadae5e701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 22:36:55 +0200
> > > > Subject: [PATCHv3] sdhci-of-esdhc: Support 8BIT bus width.
> > > >
> > > > esdhc_readb()/esdhc_writeb() did not adjust for 8BIT.
> > >
> > > Do we really need this for the 8bit bus support? There is already a specific
> > > API for setting the bus width, this change seems unnecessary to me. That is
> > > also why I choose to revert that patch. Did I miss something?
> >
> > We do, the bus API really only works well when the bus bits are in another
> > register but the HOST_CONTROL register.
>
> Sorry, I didn't get what you mean. Could you elaborate a bit more?
clrsetbits_be32(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL,
ESDHC_CTRL_BUSWIDTH_MASK, ctrl);
and
esdhc_writeb(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg) with reg == SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL
is the same register so esdhc_writeb() will stomp on the settings esdhc_pltfm_set_bus_width()
did earlier.
>
> > The only reason 4BIT works is because its bit placement is where
> > SDHCI expects it to be. 8BIT is not, so unless readb/writeb funktions compensate
> > for that they will overwrite what the bus API set earlier.
>
> But the implementation of esdhc_pltfm_set_bus_width() already take care about
> this. And in the current kernel, we only set the bus width via this API. So why
> do you think that it can be overwrote?
>
> static void esdhc_pltfm_set_bus_width(struct sdhci_host *host, int width)
> {
> u32 ctrl;
>
> switch (width) {
> case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8:
> ctrl = ESDHC_CTRL_8BITBUS;
> break;
>
> case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4:
> ctrl = ESDHC_CTRL_4BITBUS;
> break;
>
> default:
> ctrl = 0;
> break;
> }
>
> clrsetbits_be32(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL,
> ESDHC_CTRL_BUSWIDTH_MASK, ctrl);
> }
>
> >
> > Atleast this is my understanding, Ulf?
> >
> > Didn't this patch work for you either?
>
> I don't have a 8bit card at hand. For 4bit card, it works with or without this
> change.
Sure it does, that was not the question though:
Does it still work with this version of the patch?
Jocke--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
