On 20 April 2015 at 14:09, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Currently "mmc sleep" is used before power off and
> is not paired with waking up. Nevertheless hold
> re-tuning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> index f36c76f..daf9954 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
>
> #include "core.h"
> +#include "host.h"
> #include "bus.h"
> #include "mmc_ops.h"
> #include "sd_ops.h"
> @@ -1504,6 +1505,7 @@ static int mmc_can_sleep(struct mmc_card *card)
> return (card && card->ext_csd.rev >= 3);
> }
>
> +/* If necessary, callers must hold re-tuning */
Remove this comment.
> static int mmc_sleep(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
> @@ -1631,6 +1633,7 @@ static int _mmc_suspend(struct mmc_host *host, bool is_suspend)
> int err = 0;
> unsigned int notify_type = is_suspend ? EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_SHORT :
> EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_LONG;
> + bool retune_release = false;
>
> BUG_ON(!host);
> BUG_ON(!host->card);
> @@ -1651,17 +1654,22 @@ static int _mmc_suspend(struct mmc_host *host, bool is_suspend)
> goto out;
>
> if (mmc_can_poweroff_notify(host->card) &&
> - ((host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_FULL_PWR_CYCLE) || !is_suspend))
> + ((host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_FULL_PWR_CYCLE) || !is_suspend)) {
> err = mmc_poweroff_notify(host->card, notify_type);
> - else if (mmc_can_sleep(host->card))
> + } else if (mmc_can_sleep(host->card)) {
> + mmc_retune_hold(host);
> err = mmc_sleep(host);
> - else if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host))
> + } else if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host)) {
> err = mmc_deselect_cards(host);
> + }
>
> if (!err) {
> mmc_power_off(host);
> mmc_card_set_suspended(host->card);
> }
> +
> + if (retune_release)
> + mmc_retune_release(host);
> out:
> mmc_release_host(host);
> return err;
Instead of add mmc_retune_hold|release() to _mmc_suspend(), I would
like you to move that handling into mmc_sleep(). The code should be
easier and it becomes more clear that it's because of a command
sequence.
I think mmc_retune_hold() should be invoked before mmc_wait_for_cmd()
and then mmc_retune_release() just after, in mmc_sleep(). That should
work, right!?
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
