On 17 April 2015 at 11:12, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ulf,
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 17 March 2015 at 04:13, Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > +
>> > + msdc_set_buswidth(host, ios->bus_width);
>> > +
>> > + /* Suspend/Resume will do power off/on */
>> > + switch (ios->power_mode) {
>> > + case MMC_POWER_UP:
>> > + msdc_init_hw(host);
>> > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) {
>> > + ret = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc,
>> > + ios->vdd);
>> > + if (ret) {
>> > + dev_err(host->dev, "Failed to set vmmc power!\n");
>> > + return;
>> > + }
>> > + }
>> > + break;
>> > + case MMC_POWER_ON:
>> > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc)) {
>> > + ret = regulator_enable(mmc->supply.vqmmc);
>>
>> The calls to regulator_enable|disable() for the vqmmc will not be
>> balanced properly here. You need a local cache variable like
>> "is_enabled" to keep track of this.
>
> Shouldn't the MMC core provide balanced hooks for this? What about
> MMC_POWER_UP, can this be used for enabling regulators?
Currently host drivers deals with vqmmc enabling/disabling, setting
voltage, etc - entirely by them selves.
Dough Anderson is working on fixing that:
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1503.1/03108.html
MMC_POWER_UP is when vmmc shall be enabled.
MMC_POWER_ON is when vqmmc shall be enabled.
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
