Hi Maya. Thanks for the information. There are thoughts that missing support for "non-urgent" bkops request could be reason of unexpected slowdowns of eMMC i/o that customer is observing. Thus the interest on the current status. However, no particular projects or needs yet. Nikita > Hi Nikita, > > The patch got stuck for a while as there was a request to use the runtime > PM framework for implementing the idle time BKOPs and I didn't have the > ability to test it back then. > We plan to re-implement and test in the upcoming few months (aim to July). > Do you have a need for this feature in an earlier date or it can wait for > july? > > Thanks, > Maya > >> Hi >> >> Some months ago, you've been working on "idle time bkops" feature. The >> latest (v6) sign of this work I could found is [1] >> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/14/29 >> >> However this did not land in mainline, also no replies, and no sign of >> any follow-up... Complete mystery what has happened to this effort :( >> >> What is the latest status of "idle time bkops" functionality? >> Is any working implementation available? >> >> TIA, >> Nikita Yushchenko >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
