On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
>
>>> +int mmc_pwrseq_simple_alloc(struct mmc_host *host, struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct mmc_pwrseq_simple *pwrseq;
>>> +
>>> + pwrseq = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_pwrseq_simple), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!pwrseq)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + pwrseq->pwrseq.ops = &mmc_pwrseq_simple_ops;
>>> + host->pwrseq = &pwrseq->pwrseq;
>>
>> How about making this function return a struct mmc_pwrseq * so this
>> last line can be moved to mmc_pwrseq_alloc() instead of requiring all
>> power sequences to do it?
>>
>> The same applies to
>>
>> host->pwrseq = NULL;
>>
>> in mmc_pwrseq_simple_free(), which could be done in mmc_pwrseq_free() it seems.
>
> Thanks for reviewing!
>
> I like you suggestion, though $subject patch is already part of the PR for 3.20.
>
> Feel free to send a patch, I would happily apply it.
Damn, why am I always so late to review patches...
I will send a fixup patch - better to have this done early.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
