Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] mmc: sdhci-pxav3: Fix SDR50 and DDR50 capabilities for the Armada 38x flavor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ulf,

On 29/01/2015 10:31, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>> Seems like this function can be void instead of always returning 0.
>>
>> In patch 4 "mmc: sdhci-pxav3: Modify clock settings for the SDR50 and
>> DDR50 modes", this function can return other values than 0.
>>
>> I could change the prototype in patch 4, but it would also imply
>> removing the test of the return value in this patch and adding in back
>> patch 4. By returning a value in this patch, it reduced the amount of
>> change over the patches.
>>
>> But if you still prefer than I this function return void in this
>> patch, I can do it.
> 
> No worries, let's keep it as an int. But then I have a few other
> comments, see below.

OK

> 
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gregory
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> +{
>>>> +       host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_MISSING_CAPS;
>>>> +       /*
>>>> +        * According to erratum 'FE-2946959' both SDR50 and DDR50
>>>> +        * modes require specific clock adjustments in SDIO3
>>>> +        * Configuration register, if the adjustment is not done,
>>>> +        * remove them from the capabilities.
>>>> +        */
>>>> +       host->caps1 = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1);
>>>> +       host->caps1 &= ~(SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR50 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50);
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  static void pxav3_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
>>>>  {
>>>>         struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(mmc_dev(host->mmc));
>>>> @@ -319,6 +333,9 @@ static int sdhci_pxav3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>                 clk_prepare_enable(pxa->clk_core);
>>>>
>>>>         if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "marvell,armada-380-sdhci")) {
>>>> +               ret = armada_38x_quirks(host);
>>>> +               if (ret < 0)
> 
> Since in patch 4 you return a proper error code, let's also adopt to
> that here by changing to:
> 
> "if (IS_ERR(ret))

The function returns an int and IS_ERR expects a pointer. I am not sure
this macro would be appropriate here.


> 
>>>> +                       goto err_quirks;
>>>>                 ret = mv_conf_mbus_windows(pdev, mv_mbus_dram_info());
>>>>                 if (ret < 0)
>>>>                         goto err_mbus_win;
>>>> @@ -400,6 +417,7 @@ err_mbus_win:
>>>>         if (!IS_ERR(pxa->clk_core))
>>>>                 clk_disable_unprepare(pxa->clk_core);
>>>>  err_clk_get:
>>>> +err_quirks:
> 
> You don't need the new label, you could use "err_clk_get".

Right.

Thanks,

Gregory




-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux