On 30 June 2014 at 11:07, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi All, > > Here is a resend of 3 of my submission of Sascha Hauer's > "mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing" patch. > > Can we please get some movement on these patches, either a review specifying > why this cannot go upstream, or else queuing it up for next / 3.17 ? > > Changes since v1: > - Submit as a stand-alone patch-set, rather then as part of a larger oob irq > support patchset crossing multiple subsystems > - Add a patch to document the already existing practice of using slot subnodes > - Split of the dt bindings documentation for sdio-func child nodes into its > own patch > - Add a preparation patch, setting slot_no where relevant > - And finally the "Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing" patch itself > has been modified to look for the sdio function childnodes under a slot node > instead of directly under the host node > > Changes since v2: > - Drop the slot subnodes again, and drop the 2 slot subnodes patches > > Regards, > > Hans So after quite a delay (sorry about that!!), I decided to apply this patchset for my next branch. Only a minor trivial conflict showed up on patch2. Also I took the liberty to change the prefix of patch 1 into only "mmc". Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
