Hi. Ulf.
Your patch has bug..
If last sample value is failed, then it's returned with error.
I will recommend this. how about?
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
index d0d7aec..d6b8846 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc;
u8 start_smpl, smpl, candiates = 0;
s8 found = -1;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret = 0, success;
start_smpl = dw_mci_exynos_get_clksmpl(host);
@@ -389,8 +389,8 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
mci_writel(host, TMOUT, ~0);
smpl = dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(host);
- ret = mmc_send_tuning(mmc);
- if (!ret)
+ success = mmc_send_tuning(mmc);
+ if (!success)
candiates |= (1 << smpl);
} while (start_smpl != smpl);
--
1.9.1
On 12/22/2014 11:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 20 December 2014 at 14:18, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Ulf,
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 6 December 2014 at 13:43, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hi Ulf,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Instead of having a local hack taking care of sending the tuning
>>>>> command and as well to verify the response pattern, let's convert to
>>>>> the common mmc_send_tuning() API.
>>>>>
>>>>> This change affects the Exynos variant, since it's the only one which
>>>>> support the dw_mmc's ->execute_tuning() callback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Alim, thanks for helping out testing!
>>>
>>>> With this change HS200 mode does not work on exynos5800 peach-pi board.
>>>> I got below error while testing this series:
>>>>
>>>> mmc0: tuning execution failed
>>>> mmc0: error -5 whilst initialising MMC card
>>>>
>>>> Though, your's next branch with commit _a1d06b4_ works fine in HS200 mode.
>>>
>>> I was looking into the details of what change my patchset introduces
>>> for dw_mmc-exynos. Apparently, dw_mmc-exynos was using the
>>> MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION to end the tuning reqeust (CMD21/19). The new
>>> mmc_send_tuning() API doesn't, which also conforms to what the eMMC/SD
>>> specifications states.
>>>
>>> Do you have any idea of why dw_mmc-exynos was using
>>> MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION for CMD19/21?
>>>
>>> To see if my theory is correct, could you try out the following patch
>>> on top of $subject patch?
>>> BTW, I have queued patch 1 and 2, from this patchset available on my
>>> next branch.
>>>
>>>
>>> From e1ac35bb0e90254275ec7088f41e6e2d59e48367 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:58:48 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: End tuning request with stop command
>>>
>>> Not to be merged!
>>>
>>> This patch adds the MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION command to end a tuning
>>> request. For some reason dw_mmc seems to need this to complete the
>>> tuning request without errors.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
>>> index 3b044c5..aa79e0c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
>>> @@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ int mmc_send_tuning(struct mmc_host *host)
>>> {
>>> struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
>>> struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
>>> + struct mmc_command stop = {0};
>>> struct mmc_data data = {0};
>>> struct scatterlist sg;
>>> struct mmc_ios *ios = &host->ios;
>>> @@ -576,10 +577,14 @@ int mmc_send_tuning(struct mmc_host *host)
>>>
>>> mrq.cmd = &cmd;
>>> mrq.data = &data;
>>> + mrq.stop = &stop;
>>>
>>> cmd.opcode = opcode;
>>> cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
>>>
>>> + stop.opcode = MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION;
>>> + stop.flags = MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
>>> +
>>> data.blksz = size;
>>> data.blocks = 1;
>>> data.flags = MMC_DATA_READ;
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>> Sorry for delay in testing this suggested patch, I would say this
>> certainly helps, but still I need to change sample phase to make it
>> work with generic tuning function.
>> So with your's adding STOP_TRANSMISSION command and below change,
>> HS200 works well on exynos5800
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
>> index e8fdda8..e0f0337 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
>> @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@
>> card-detect-delay = <200>;
>> clock-frequency = <400000000>;
>> samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
>> - samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <0 4>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 4>;
>>
>> This basically change the clock-sample phase with which the tuning
>> process starts.
>>
>> I didn't find anything is exynos documentations which suggest
>> STOP_TRANSMISSION is needed, may be Seungwon might be know as he wrote
>> this.
>>
>> Are you ok to add STOP_TRANSMISSION in generic tuning code (probably
>> with a quirk, so that other hosts are still happy)?
>
> No, I don't want that.
>
> If special treatment are needed for dw_mmc to handle a tuning request,
> dw_mmc should be able to take care by itself. How about below patch,
> do you think that could work?
>
>>From c2e5783beaa322178f2336b4bff4bdf13da76f56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:24:14 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Generate stop commands for failed tuning
> requests
>
> It's seems like dw_mmc internal logic expects failed data transfers to
> be ended using a stop command. Let the tuning requests also fall into
> this category, since there are data transfer involved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index a1b80e5..976382db 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -314,7 +314,9 @@ static u32 dw_mci_prep_stop_abort(struct dw_mci
> *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> if (cmdr == MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK ||
> cmdr == MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK ||
> cmdr == MMC_WRITE_BLOCK ||
> - cmdr == MMC_WRITE_MULTIPLE_BLOCK) {
> + cmdr == MMC_WRITE_MULTIPLE_BLOCK ||
> + cmdr == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK ||
> + cmdr == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200) {
> stop->opcode = MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION;
> stop->arg = 0;
> stop->flags = MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
