On 19 December 2014 at 21:01, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12 December 2014 at 20:28, Bjorn Andersson >> <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Some more explanation to why this needed would be good. >> > > Because (according to the git log) some of the memories that we > mounted in Xperia Z1 does not support HS200 even though they advertise > they are. I see. How about using an mmc card quirk instead of a DT binding then? Kind regards Uffe > > I thought we needed for the device I'm testing with, but a couple of > regulator_set_optimum_mode() solved that - so I have to provide a > patch for that as well... > >>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 2 ++ >> >> This file lists the generic mmc DT bindings, but you want to add a >> specific binding for sdhci? >> > > Looking in sdhci_get_of_property() it's a mash of device specific > properties, sdhci specific properties documented in mmc.txt and > generic sdhci properties documented in device specific bindings. > > Would you like me to move it to a generic sdhci.txt binding and update > the individual sdhci-* to reference that instead of mmc.txt? Or should > I just add the property in the device specific bindings? Or maybe we > could keep it as a optional property in mmc.txt? > > Regards, > Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
