Hi Doug, On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We've introduced a new helper in the MMC core: > mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(). Let's use this in dw_mmc. Using this new > helper has some advantages: > > 1. We get the mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() behavior of trying to match > VQMMC and VMMC when the signal voltage is 3.3V. This ensures max > compatibility. > > 2. We get rid of a few more warnings when probing unsupported > voltages. > > 3. We get rid of some non-dw_mmc specific code in dw_mmc. > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> One small comment below... > @@ -1170,24 +1168,11 @@ static int dw_mci_switch_voltage(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios) > */ > uhs = mci_readl(host, UHS_REG); > if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330) { > - min_uv = 2700000; > - max_uv = 3600000; > uhs &= ~v18; > } else { > - min_uv = 1700000; > - max_uv = 1950000; > uhs |= v18; > } > - if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc)) { > - ret = regulator_set_voltage(mmc->supply.vqmmc, min_uv, max_uv); > - > - if (ret) { > - dev_dbg(&mmc->class_dev, > - "Regulator set error %d: %d - %d\n", > - ret, min_uv, max_uv); > - return ret; > - } > - } > + mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, ios); Shouldn't we check the return value here and bail out of the voltage switch procedure if it fails? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html