On 11/27/2014 11:23 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> +static inline void rtsx_pci_write_be32(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr, u16 reg, u32 val) >> >+{ >> >+ rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, reg, 0xFF, val >> 24); >> >+ rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, reg + 1, 0xFF, val >> 16); >> >+ rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, reg + 2, 0xFF, val >> 8); >> >+ rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, reg + 3, 0xFF, val); > This assumes the cpu is little endian. First convert to big endian > using cpu_to_be32() and then write it out. > > __be32 be_val = cpu_to_be32() > > rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, reg, 0xFF, be_val); > rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, reg + 1, 0xFF, be_val >> 8); > rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, reg + 2, 0xFF, be_val >> 16); > rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, reg + 3, 0xFF, be_val >> 24); > > (Written hurredly in my mail client. May be wrong). > I think we better not use cpu_to_be32() here, leave the work to caller may be better. eg, in sd_ops.c the cmd.arg is constructed bit by bit, we can put the right byte to the right register by shift, so the endian check is not need.?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{炳i?)?骅w*jg????????G??⒏⒎?:+v????????????"??????