On 23 October 2014 13:47, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 10/23/2014 01:31 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote:
>> When the error code is -EPROBE_DEFER, this will already be reported
>> so don't emit an error message in that case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> index 7ac6718..d5812a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ static int sdhci_arasan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_arasan_pdata, 0);
>> if (IS_ERR(host)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(host);
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform init failed (%d)\n", ret);
>> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform init failed (%d)\n", ret);
>> goto clk_disable_all;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -172,7 +173,8 @@ static int sdhci_arasan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> ret = sdhci_add_host(host);
>> if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform register failed (%d)\n", ret);
>> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform register failed (%d)\n", ret);
>> goto err_pltfm_free;
>> }
>
>
> I checked other drivers and they are not reporting these bugs. I have briefly looked
> at sdhci_add_host and sdhci_platfm_init and they are pretty good error description
> + core itself should report if driver probe failed.
> That's why I think that it is just reasonable to remove these both dev_err completely.
>
> What do you think?
I agree, this seems reasonable!
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
