Hi Mike, On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 05:42:18PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Maxime Ripard (2014-09-22 04:31:33) > > Mike, > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:18:14PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Here is an attempt at improving the MMC clock support in the Allwinner > > > SoCs. > > > > > > Until now, the MMC clocks were having a custom phase function that was > > > directly setting an obscure value in the right register, because we > > > were not really having any idea of what these values were. > > > > > > Now that we have more informations, we can introduce a common function > > > call to get and set the phase of a particular clock, and use this in > > > both our provider and our client. > > > > It would be great that we have that custom phase API out of the kernel > > for 3.18, and you were one of the greatest supporters to that idea, > > could we please have your view on this? > > Patches all look good to me. Did you want the whole series to go through > the clk tree? I guess it would be where it most make sense yes. > If so we'll need an Ack for the MMC patch and for the ARM DTS > patches as well. We already have an Ack from Ulf on the MMC patch, and I'm the maintainer of the DTS involved, so we should be ok :) Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
