The imx6sx usdhc is derived from imx6sl, the difference is minor.
imx6sx have the errata ESDHC_FLAG_ERR004536 fixed.
So introduce a new compatible string for imx6sx to distinguish them.
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index dc0e384..87179c4 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -150,6 +150,11 @@ static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_imx6sl_data = {
| ESDHC_FLAG_HAVE_CAP1 | ESDHC_FLAG_ERR004536,
};
+static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_imx6sx_data = {
+ .flags = ESDHC_FLAG_USDHC | ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING
+ | ESDHC_FLAG_HAVE_CAP1,
+};
+
struct pltfm_imx_data {
u32 scratchpad;
struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
@@ -190,6 +195,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx_esdhc_dt_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx35-esdhc", .data = &esdhc_imx35_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx51-esdhc", .data = &esdhc_imx51_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx53-esdhc", .data = &esdhc_imx53_data, },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx6sx_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6sl-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx6sl_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx6q_data, },
{ /* sentinel */ }
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
