On 3 September 2014 14:05, Dong Aisheng <b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The imx6sx usdhc is derived from imx6sl, the difference is minor.
> imx6sx have the errata ESDHC_FLAG_ERR004536 fixed.
> So introduce a new compatible string for imx6sx to distinguish them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Dong,
This one has checkpatch errors due to missing DT documentation.
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index dc0e384..87179c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,11 @@ static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_imx6sl_data = {
> | ESDHC_FLAG_HAVE_CAP1 | ESDHC_FLAG_ERR004536,
> };
>
> +static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_imx6sx_data = {
> + .flags = ESDHC_FLAG_USDHC | ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING
> + | ESDHC_FLAG_HAVE_CAP1,
> +};
> +
> struct pltfm_imx_data {
> u32 scratchpad;
> struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
> @@ -190,6 +195,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx_esdhc_dt_ids[] = {
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-esdhc", .data = &esdhc_imx35_data, },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx51-esdhc", .data = &esdhc_imx51_data, },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx53-esdhc", .data = &esdhc_imx53_data, },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx6sx_data, },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sl-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx6sl_data, },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx6q_data, },
> { /* sentinel */ }
> --
> 1.7.8
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
