Hi Ulf, > I am not sure adding a DT binding for non access to rpmb would be > needed. At least until we heard of a similar case as Adrian describes > but for rpmb. > > BTW, I just posted a patch which disabled partition scan of the boot > area, what to you think about that? > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=140973496402028&w=2 > > Finally I am also wondering whether we could and thus should, handle > these situations entirely without using a host cap. In principle what > we need is a more sophisticated error handling when the switch errors > occurs, while trying to switch to the boot area/rpmb partitions. Could > you maybe investigate that option, before we decide to add a new DT > binding? According to me and what Hsin-Hsiang Tseng wrote, it seems that we should be able to have access to boot partitions if we want to give a possibility of writing u-boot in one (or both) of them. This is the way the i.MX6 will boot on a eMMC if I read the reference manual correctly, but I didn't tested it yet. But there is no need to scan those partitions at boot, as there will probably never be a partition table inside, as you said. All we need is providing access to mmc[n]blkpboot0 and mmc[n]blkpboot1 and a way to tell which one is used as default boot partition. This is my point of view, but I didn't read JESD84-A441 so I don't know if this is the good way. Regards, JM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
