Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 1 September 2014 15:28, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> I understand your concern, but I don't see why there should be any >>> major difference in clock management code (clk tree wise), due to this >>> patch. It worked before, so likely it will work now!? >> >> It will ony work *differently*, it will change the clock management. It won't >> break, but again it's *not* the purpose of the patch. The patch is aimed at >> removing a warning. > > Sorry if I was to vague, you must have misinterpreted my proposal. Let > me try clarify how I think a patch should look like to solve the > warning. > > 1) In pxamci_set_ios() replace " clk_enable()" with clk_prepare_enable(). > 2) In pxamci_set_ios() replace " clk_disable()" with clk_disable_unprepare(). > > That should do the trick! OK, I got it now, and yes, the clock flow will be the same. I'm on my way to send v2 patch. Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html