Many thanks for your helps.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/8/18 20:07, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 18 August 2014 05:04, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From 21266249bbbaf9407c1e88cd5950e06ac88aeebf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:48:14 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on sdio thread
>>
>> 781e989cf59 ("mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ handling") and
>> bf3b5ec66bd ("mmc: sdio_irq: rework sdio irq handling") disabled
>> the use of our own custom threaded IRQ handler, but left in an
>> unconditional wake_up_process() on that handler at resume-time.
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80151
>>
>> In addition, the check for MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ capability is added
>> before enable sdio IRQ.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks! Applied for next and added a stable tag for v3.16+.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>> index e636d9e..3fc40a7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>> @@ -992,8 +992,16 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - if (!err && host->sdio_irqs)
>> - wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>> + if (!err && host->sdio_irqs) {
>> + if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>> + wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>> + mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>> + host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
>> + mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> mmc_release_host(host);
>>
>> host->pm_flags &= ~MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> index 5cc13c8..696eca4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card)
>> host->sdio_irqs--;
>> return err;
>> }
>> - } else {
>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card)
>> if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>> atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1);
>> kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>> - } else {
>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>> -- 1.7.1
>>
>> On 2014/8/12 18:23, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 11 August 2014 07:49, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> From 6cee984e1d76ba0a3320430f8cf4318ab65fcf06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:44:38 +0800
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on sdio thread
>>>>
>>>> 781e989cf59 ("mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ handling") and
>>>> bf3b5ec66bd ("mmc: sdio_irq: rework sdio irq handling") disabled
>>>> the use of our own custom threaded IRQ handler, but left in an
>>>> unconditional wake_up_process() on that handler at resume-time.
>>>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80151
>>>>
>>>> In addition, the check for MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ capability is added
>>>> before enable sdio IRQ.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fu Zhonghui <zhonghui.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>>>> index e636d9e..e04a540 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
>>>> @@ -992,8 +992,18 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - if (!err && host->sdio_irqs)
>>>> - wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>>>> + if (!err && host->sdio_irqs) {
>>>> + if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>>>> + wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>>>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>>>> + mmc_release_host(host);
>>> Why mmc_release_host() and the corresponding mmc_claim_host() below?
>>> Those shouldn't be needed I think.
>> You are right. These two functions shouldn't be invoked here. I made a new patch as above.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Zhonghui
>>>
>>>> + mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>>>> + host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
>>>> + mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>>>> + mmc_claim_host(host);
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> mmc_release_host(host);
>>>>
>>>> host->pm_flags &= ~MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>>>> index 5cc13c8..696eca4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>>>> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card)
>>>> host->sdio_irqs--;
>>>> return err;
>>>> }
>>>> - } else {
>>>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>>>> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>>>> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
>>>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>>>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card)
>>>> if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) {
>>>> atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1);
>>>> kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread);
>>>> - } else {
>>>> + } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) {
>>>> mmc_host_clk_hold(host);
>>>> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
>>>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>>>> -- 1.7.1
>>>>
>>> Thanks for working on this!
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Uffe
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
