Re: sdhci_s3c_consider_clock scheduling while atomic - clk_round_rate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24 June 2014 17:52, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> [adding Ulf, Chris and Mike to the discussion]
>
> On 24.06.2014 11:48, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> sdhci_s3c_set_clock is called from sdhci_do_set_ios with interrupts
>> disabled, and this calls into sdhci_s3c_consider_clock().
>>
>> The patch "mmc: sdhci-s3c: Cache bus clock rates" addressed some
>> scheduling while atomic in this function, but there are more issues
>> here, seen while testing 3.16-rc2 on exynos4412:
>>
>> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:103
>> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 75, name: mmcqd/0
>> Preemption disabled at:[<  (null)>]   (null)
>>
>> CPU: 0 PID: 75 Comm: mmcqd/0 Not tainted 3.16.0-rc2-00028-ge9fe7eb-dirty #77
>> [<c0016140>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0011e14>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>> [<c0011e14>] (show_stack) from [<c05ce8a8>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xc4)
>> [<c05ce8a8>] (dump_stack) from [<c05d2de0>] (mutex_lock+0x1c/0x3c)
>> [<c05d2de0>] (mutex_lock) from [<c046214c>] (clk_prepare_lock+0x6c/0xf4)
>> [<c046214c>] (clk_prepare_lock) from [<c04625ac>] (clk_round_rate+0x10/0x2c)
>> [<c04625ac>] (clk_round_rate) from [<c0447628>] (sdhci_s3c_set_clock+0x4c/0x1e8)
>> [<c0447628>] (sdhci_s3c_set_clock) from [<c0447818>]
>> (sdhci_cmu_set_clock+0x54/0x140)
>> [<c0447818>] (sdhci_cmu_set_clock) from [<c0443a38>]
>> (sdhci_do_set_ios+0x138/0x58c)
>> [<c0443a38>] (sdhci_do_set_ios) from [<c0443864>] (sdhci_set_ios+0x28/0x34)
>>
>> clk_round_rate cannot be called here because it takes a mutex.
>>
>> sdhci_s3c_set_clock() also calls into clk_prepare_enable() which looks
>> like it could trigger this problem too.
>
> Apparently this is related to generic sdhci code calling .set_clock()
> under spin_lock_irqsave(). For reference, see sdhci_do_set_ios() and
> sdhci_tasklet_finish().
>
> Chris, Ulf, any suggestions?

Well, the approach I think of is simply to invoke
spin_unlock_irqrestore() prior the ->set_clock callbacks are invoked.

The spinlock then needs to be handled by each ->set_clock callback for
each driver. To simplify for ->set_clock callbacks, we might also want
to add spinlock handling to the exported library function,
sdhci_set_clock().

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux