On 28 May 2014 15:46, <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch adds a fake Qualcomm ID 0x00051180 to the amba_ids, as Qualcomm
> SDCC controller is pl180, but amba id registers read 0x0's.
> The plan is to remove SDCC driver totally and use mmci as the main SD
> controller driver for Qualcomm SOCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> index a38e714..86f25a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,14 @@ static struct variant_data variant_ux500v2 = {
> .pwrreg_nopower = true,
> };
>
> +static struct variant_data variant_qcom = {
> + .fifosize = 16 * 4,
> + .fifohalfsize = 8 * 4,
> + .clkreg = MCI_CLK_ENABLE,
> + .datalength_bits = 24,
> + .pwrreg_powerup = MCI_PWR_UP,
> +};
> +
> static int mmci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> {
> struct mmci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> @@ -1750,6 +1758,12 @@ static struct amba_id mmci_ids[] = {
> .mask = 0xf0ffffff,
> .data = &variant_ux500v2,
> },
> + /* Qualcomm variants */
> + {
> + .id = 0x00051180,
> + .mask = 0x000fffff,
> + .data = &variant_qcom,
> + },
> { 0, 0 },
> };
Shouldn't this patch be moved to very end of this patchset?
If we would apply this patch on it's own - the Qcom variant wouldn't
work, right?
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
