On 27.05.2014 10:07, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The sunxi pinctrl irq chip driver does not support wakeup at the
>> moment. Adding IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE lets the irqs work with
>> drivers using wakeup.
>>
>> Also add a name to the irq chip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Hans
>> de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2
>> insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c index db9ccd6..ec60c2e
>> 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c +++
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c @@ -646,6 +646,8 @@
>> static struct irq_chip sunxi_pinctrl_irq_chip = { .irq_mask_ack =
>> sunxi_pinctrl_irq_mask_ack, .irq_unmask =
>> sunxi_pinctrl_irq_unmask, .irq_set_type =
>> sunxi_pinctrl_irq_set_type, + .name = "sunxi-pio", + .flags =
>> IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
>
> I'd rather see the name set to dev_name() or something like that.
> This will not work that great with multiple pin controller
> supporting interrupts.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've always thought that struct irq_chip
describes a class of IRQ controllers, not particular instances.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
