Hi,
On 05/27/2014 10:07 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The sunxi pinctrl irq chip driver does not support wakeup at the
>> moment. Adding IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE lets the irqs work with drivers
>> using wakeup.
>>
>> Also add a name to the irq chip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> index db9ccd6..ec60c2e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> @@ -646,6 +646,8 @@ static struct irq_chip sunxi_pinctrl_irq_chip = {
>> .irq_mask_ack = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_mask_ack,
>> .irq_unmask = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_unmask,
>> .irq_set_type = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_set_type,
>> + .name = "sunxi-pio",
>> + .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
>
> I'd rather see the name set to dev_name() or something like that. This
> will not work that great with multiple pin controller supporting
> interrupts.
That would require moving the irq_chip struct to become a member of the
sunxi_pinctrl struct. Not undoable, but that seems like something which
should be done in a separate patch. So shall I just drop the .name part
of this patch for now ?
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
