On 23 May 2014 09:16, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 19 May 2014 20:02, Sebastian Hesselbarth >> <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> DT-enabled Dove moved over from ARCH_DOVE in mach-dove to MACH_DOVE in >>> mach-mvebu. As non-DT ARCH_DOVE will stay to rot for a while, add a new >>> DT-only MACH_DOVE Kconfig. This slipped through the cracks and now is >>> a fix to allow to build Dove's SDHCI driver for mach-mvebu on v3.15-rc. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Thanks! Picked up for the PR I send to Chris. > > Ulf, you might consider adding your tree to linux-next if this is > going to be a common work flow for you guys. That's done already. :-) There are patches which makes this visible in the MAINTAINERS as well, queued for 3.16. git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc.git next Though due to merge conflicts, during this release cycle, I didn't want to queue any patches besides for the mmci host driver. > > It's partially up to Chris though, if he's OK with patches going into > your branch more or less being guaranteed to make it into his as well. > Yes, we need to figure out a good work flow when using two separate trees. Thanks for bringing this up! Kind regards Ulf Hansson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
