Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates for mmc-next for 3.16, take 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ulf,

On Thu, May 08 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Note 2)
> I have not included the patch below; since I think it would be better
> if you just drop the patch which this is reverting from your mmc next
> branch.
> [PATCH 1/2] mmc: rtsx: Revert "mmc: rtsx: modify error handle and
> remove smatch warnings"

Thanks for putting this together, I've dropped that patch and pulled
in your patchset to mmc-next now.

Something I'm curious about -- if I drop the above rtsx patch from
(what used to be) origin/mmc-next and then pull your branch, I get:

>From git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc
 * branch            mmc-next_for_chris_3.16_take2 -> FETCH_HEAD
Auto-merging drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
CONFLICT (add/add): Merge conflict in drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
Auto-merging drivers/mmc/host/mxcmmc.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/mmc/host/mxcmmc.c
Auto-merging drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
Auto-merging drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.

The conflict in rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c is understandable, but I wonder why
mxcmmc.c grew a conflict when it wasn't modified by the patch I
dropped?  If you happen to know, would be great to understand it. :)

Thanks!

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <http://printf.net/>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux