Hi, On 05/06/2014 07:04 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Hans de Goede (2014-05-02 08:57:14) >> The first 2 patches are depenencies which should go in through the clk tree, >> Mike can you pick these 2 up please ? : > > Taken into clk-next. Thanks! >> "clk: sunxi: factors: automatic reparenting support" >> Is uncontroversial and has been favorably reviewed by various people. >> >> "clk: sunxi: Implement MMC phase control" >> Is somewhat more controversial as there has been lots of discussion about >> adding a generic phase control method to the clk framework. The problem is >> that there has been a lot of talk about such a generic phase control method >> but not a single patch. Therefor I would like to move forwards with using >> a platform specific method for now. I hereby promise that once we've a generic >> method I'll write patches to convert the sunxi code to that method. > > Thanks for the promise. I will hold you to it once the set_phase api is > sorted ;-) Hehe, no problem when I promise something I expect to be kept to it. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
