Hi, On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:22:45PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:15:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:08:49PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote: > > > I just tried the different parts of the patch. Without the following > > > change, emmc works: > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > > > @@ -1507,12 +1507,6 @@ static void sdhci_do_set_ios(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios) > > > host->ops->set_clock(host, host->clock); > > > } > > > > > > - > > > - /* Reset SD Clock Enable */ > > > - clk = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL); > > > - clk &= ~SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN; > > > - sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL); > > > - > > > > So the bit which stops us violating the SD spec stops eMMC from working... > > that's... just great. > > > > Okay, I'll look deeper at this and see what can be done, but I suspect it > > will turn out to require more patches and be more invasive. > > In the mean time, here's the remainder (to patch 33) of the series with > this commit omitted. I tested the whole series again, from 1 to patch 32 and it is working correctly now on the RIoT board (imx6s) with emmc and sd-card. You can add my tested-by tag for all core and imx related patches if you want to. Regards, Markus -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
