On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > The is_enabled implementation is wrong in some cases: > e.g. for pbias_mmc_omap5: enable_mask is : BIT(27) | BIT(25) | BIT(26) > However, pbias_regulator_enable() only sets BIT(27) | BIT(26) bits. > So is_enabled callback will always return false in this case. > Fix the logic to compare the register value with info->enable rather than > info->enable_mask. Applied both, thanks.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
