Hi Aaron,
This patch is tested on Intel platform, and SDIO function driver's suspend/resume callback will only be called once, which fixed this issue. Previously, they can be called twice.
Here is the tested-by:
Tested-by: xiaoming wang <xiaoming.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
Chuanxiao
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu, Aaron
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:36 AM
> To: Ulf Hansson; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Chris Ball; Liu, Chuansheng; Dong,
> Chuanxiao
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; NeilBrown; Rafael J. Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mmc: core: Invoke sdio func driver's PM callbacks from the
> sdio bus
>
> Hi Chuansheng & Chuanxiao,
>
> Can you please help us testing this patch on your platform and let us know the test
> result? Thanks.
>
> -Aaron
>
> On 02/28/2014 07:49 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > The sdio func device is added to the driver model after the card
> > device.
> >
> > This means the sdio func device will be suspend before the card device
> > and thus resumed after. The consequence are the mmc core don't
> > explicity need to protect itself from receiving sdio requests in
> > suspended state. Instead that can be handled from the sdio bus, which
> > is thus invokes the PM callbacks instead of old dummy function.
> >
> > In the case were the sdio func driver don't implement the PM callbacks
> > the mmc core will in the early phase of system suspend, remove the
> > card from the driver model and thus power off it.
> >
> > Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Note, this patch has only been compile tested. Would appreciate if
> > some with SDIO and a sdio func driver could help out to test this.
> > Especially the libertas driver would be nice.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c | 45 ++++---------------------------------------
> > drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c | 14 +-------------
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c index
> > 4d721c6..9933e42 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
> > @@ -943,40 +943,21 @@ static int mmc_sdio_pre_suspend(struct mmc_host
> *host)
> > */
> > static int mmc_sdio_suspend(struct mmc_host *host) {
> > - int i, err = 0;
> > -
> > - for (i = 0; i < host->card->sdio_funcs; i++) {
> > - struct sdio_func *func = host->card->sdio_func[i];
> > - if (func && sdio_func_present(func) && func->dev.driver) {
> > - const struct dev_pm_ops *pmops = func->dev.driver->pm;
> > - err = pmops->suspend(&func->dev);
> > - if (err)
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - while (err && --i >= 0) {
> > - struct sdio_func *func = host->card->sdio_func[i];
> > - if (func && sdio_func_present(func) && func->dev.driver) {
> > - const struct dev_pm_ops *pmops = func->dev.driver->pm;
> > - pmops->resume(&func->dev);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (!err && mmc_card_keep_power(host) && mmc_card_wake_sdio_irq(host))
> {
> > + if (mmc_card_keep_power(host) && mmc_card_wake_sdio_irq(host)) {
> > mmc_claim_host(host);
> > sdio_disable_wide(host->card);
> > mmc_release_host(host);
> > }
> >
> > - if (!err && !mmc_card_keep_power(host))
> > + if (!mmc_card_keep_power(host))
> > mmc_power_off(host);
> >
> > - return err;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host) {
> > - int i, err = 0;
> > + int err = 0;
> >
> > BUG_ON(!host);
> > BUG_ON(!host->card);
> > @@ -1019,24 +1000,6 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
> > wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
> > mmc_release_host(host);
> >
> > - /*
> > - * If the card looked to be the same as before suspending, then
> > - * we proceed to resume all card functions. If one of them returns
> > - * an error then we simply return that error to the core and the
> > - * card will be redetected as new. It is the responsibility of
> > - * the function driver to perform further tests with the extra
> > - * knowledge it has of the card to confirm the card is indeed the
> > - * same as before suspending (same MAC address for network cards,
> > - * etc.) and return an error otherwise.
> > - */
> > - for (i = 0; !err && i < host->card->sdio_funcs; i++) {
> > - struct sdio_func *func = host->card->sdio_func[i];
> > - if (func && sdio_func_present(func) && func->dev.driver) {
> > - const struct dev_pm_ops *pmops = func->dev.driver->pm;
> > - err = pmops->resume(&func->dev);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > host->pm_flags &= ~MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER;
> > return err;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c
> > index 92d1ba8..4fa8fef9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c
> > @@ -197,20 +197,8 @@ static int sdio_bus_remove(struct device *dev)
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > -static int pm_no_operation(struct device *dev) -{
> > - /*
> > - * Prevent the PM core from calling SDIO device drivers' suspend
> > - * callback routines, which it is not supposed to do, by using this
> > - * empty function as the bus type suspend callaback for SDIO.
> > - */
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -#endif
> > -
> > static const struct dev_pm_ops sdio_bus_pm_ops = {
> > - SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_no_operation, pm_no_operation)
> > + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_generic_suspend, pm_generic_resume)
> > SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(
> > pm_generic_runtime_suspend,
> > pm_generic_runtime_resume,
> >
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��i��)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
