Chris, I haven't seen anything else get proposed. If not, can you include this patch in mmc-utils ToT and use it as a basis to drive the FFU support conversation forward? On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Alex Lemberg <Alex.Lemberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Grant, > > We will contribute shortly our FFU implementation code (RFC) , in which we are addressing both issues discussed below: > > - FW File size limitation > - Atomic FFU Process Did this get posted? my gmail filters might be misconfigured and prevented me from seeing it. > However our implementation is in both layers - kernel driver and mmc-utils. I have no objection to an implementation which requires both kernel and mmc-utils. I agree addressing those problems would be a Good Thing (tm). However, future promises should NOT prevent improving the current state. And the patch I proposed would work on existing kernels that are being shipped to run with eMMC 5.0 devices. I'm not referring to ChromeOS since I can backport changes to those kernels and deliver those to ChromeOS users within 8 weeks (worst case...best case is usually about a week). That's not necessarily true for other distributions/builds. > We will be happy to get your comments. excellent! :) thanks, grant -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
